Don't abort the truth
Editorial
by Everett J. ThomasPrint Article Email to a Friend
We believe in the sacredness of all life—from conception to natural death. But we need to find language other than “pro-life” and “pro-choice” to articulate our beliefs.
First, not all who identify themselves as pro-life are completely pro-life. They may be opposed to abortions but support the death penalty for convicted murderers or support wars that kill both the enemy and innocent people.
Second, not all who identify themselves as pro-choice are willing to extend the choice to live to an unborn baby. But we believe in this “choice.” Mennonite Church USA’s 2003 statement on abortion says, “The fetus in its earliest stages (and even if imperfect by human standards) shares humanity with those who conceived it.”
On May 17, President Obama came to northern Indiana to give a commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame and receive an honorary degree. For weeks before the event and on that Sunday, those of us who live in the area were subjected to local newscasts showing strident demonstrators. They objected to the president’s visit because of his views on abortion. Dozens of demonstrators were arrested for trespassing on the Notre Dame campus.
Some were pushing baby carriages with dolls inside—the dolls covered with fake blood. Trucks with graphic pictures of severed fetus body parts were parked in strategic locations. For days a small plane flew over the area pulling a banner with equally graphic images.
But “protests against abortion have greater integrity when they are combined with concern for all human life,” says the Mennonite Church USA statement.
Sister Helen Prejean, author of the book Dead Man Walking and activist against the death penalty, addressed the Associated Church Press convention in Indianapolis on May 7. During the question-and-answer period one person wanted to know what this diminutive but fiery Catholic nun thought of the controversy at Notre Dame.
“Using terms such as ‘pro-life’ and ‘pro-choice’ is facile labeling,” she said during her response. Prejean said that if we believe in the sanctity of life, then it must also apply to the lives of people on death row—no matter how horrific their crimes and no matter how unrepentant the sinner.
A Gallup Poll released on May 15 reported that 51 percent of U.S citizens now call themselves pro-life instead of pro-choice on the issue of abortion. This is the first time in the 15 years that Gallup has been asking the question that a majority of Americans reveal themselves to be pro-life.
But it is a false dichotomy and one Mennonites must continue to resist. It is not our conviction that the killing of life in the womb is wrong while the taking of life in an electric chair or on the battlefield is right. Life is either sacred or it is not.
A good friend of mine who also listened to Sister Helen at the Associated Church Press convention found herself converted.
“I always thought if someone took my child’s life, then that person deserved the same thing,” she said. “But Sister Helen made me think about it from a different point of view: What if it was my child who killed someone. Would I still believe my guilty child should die?”
Viewing life from the point of view of a killer’s mother is one way to touch its sanctity. Would the mother who lost her son on the battlefield want the soldier who killed him to also die if the mother of the enemy soldier was her friend?
The term “pro-life” is facile (shallow), but it also means to be “for life.” For anyone to be pro-life but also support the death penalty or war is as illogical as being “sorta pregnant.”
Mennonite Church USA can help change the national debate about abortion by insisting that all of life is sacred from conception to natural death. Those who claim to be pro-life can be so only if they are as concerned about the lives of convicted criminals or soldiers as they are concerned about the lives of unborn babies. The conviction that all life is sacred needs to come “full-term” and be born as a whole and healthy truth.
Related Resources
Editorial: "Don't abort the truth"
Discussion Guides:
Current Stories
Articles
- Thoughts on abortion
- The messiness of 21st-century mission
- Mr. Christ Comes
- Where is Jesus?
- For Franklin
News stories, digests and Meno Acontecer
- MCC's 'new wine'
- Donations extend life of CPT projects
- AMBS receives gold certification for green building
- Mexico tour focuses on women, migration
- Mennos in the News: Two bodies of Canadian Mennonite brothers found
- Berne church changes conferences
- Two Mennonites among 12 acquitted
- Indonesian, Zimbabweans swap stories
- New structure brings new voices to EMM
- MCC may become a new 'global entity'
- Hesston College graduates 156 students
Columns
- The meanings of dialogue
- When something takes the babies
- Pre-emption redemption
- Don't abort the truth
Readers Say
- Rejects business model assumptions
- Do what you love, and the money will follow
- Sex offenders not all created equal
- Child protection connection
- Disassociating with Mennonite Church USA
- Deliberately killing an unborn child is wrong
- The magazine business
Subscribe


I'll continue calling myself pro-life since I oppose war and the death penalty. However, to some people the distinction between killing innocent people and killing guilty people is relevant. People who support abortion but oppose the death penalty are inconsistent. Why protect guilty life if you won't protect innocent life? But people who take the reverse position ARE consistent. Making a distinction between killing the innocent and killing the guilty is perfectly logical. I think such people are wrong for not opposing the death penalty, I just refuse to label them inconssitent. Obama supports abortion, war and the death penalty so he is consistently pro-death. Seems like most Democratic politicians support both abortion and the death penalty. Many right-to-lifers, in my experience , oppose both. Mennonites who support abortion should never call themselves nonviolent, since abortion is a violent, homicidal, act. Instead of accusing right-to-lifers of being inconsistent for supposedly not being pro-life across the board, pro-abortion Mennonites should take the logs out of their own eyes before they seek to remove the specks from the eyes of right-to-lifers.